Saturday, June 11, 2011

Sunday Miscellany: Pale Male, Great Egret Pond, Sandhill Cranes, and a Few Flaps


Photo courtesy of palemale.com
It's wet out here, but at least cooler. Pale Male attempts a Great Horned Owl impersonation.

Photo Donegal Browne
Great Egret Pond

Photo Donegal Browne


Photo Donegal Browne
Note the female, bottom right.

Photo Donegal Browne
He eyeballs me. I get the message and don't get out of the car.

The Langer Sandhill Cranes forage at dusk.
Female left. Male right.




Photograph courtesy of palemale.com
Girl does a few energetic test flaps of her wings. The pin feathers for her primaries are just coming into view.

And the first fledge is off the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia!
http://sunnydixie.blogspot.com/

And lest anyone forgets-- Scientists use scientific discourse. And scientific discourse is civil impersonal intellectual discussion of findings in search of facts. Scientific discourse is never petty and remains within the bounds of science and on topic.

Donegal Browne

All the Divines Still at Home and the Miraculous Family on Fifth


Photograph by Rob Schmunk

Everybody is still a'nest at the Cathedral of St. John. No fledges today.

Rob took a grand shot today with all five of the Divines on the nest. That's Stormin' Norman on the right with wings spread. (He looks ever so much lighter feathered than his second year molt. Lighting?) Big Beautiful Isolde on Andrew's hand, checking something out , and the kids hanging out of harm's way and their parent's talons behind the head.


Photograph by Rob Schmunk

I had to include this photo. Look to the right side of Andrew's head. That, without a doubt, is the comedian of the group. For more go to http;//bloomingdalevillage.blogspot.com/

Photo courtesy of palemale.com
A classic. Girl watches the world go by in the shade of mom's wing and tail.

Photo courtesy of palemale.com

Look! We have feet!

Just joshing.


Though do note how soft and unused these young feet are compared to their parent's hard working feet.

I've wondered if any mirroring was part of babyhood for a hawk with a sibling. The reason why I wondered this? An important part of courting in Red-tails depends on mirroring of movement as well as a kind of physical call and response with thrown prey.


I'm not sure what they are doing here. In some ways they appear to be looking at Girl's foot as if it just appeared unattached to anything else.

Remember young Red-tails have extremely active imaginations. For those who haven't seen it wait until they start killing inanimate objects. It is hilarious.

Also note that Boy is sitting flat on him bum with both legs stretched in front of him. This stage tends to be a bit comical live. It only happens for a short while. I assume by the time they start getting a real tail it just isn't all that comfy besides they'll be getting off haunches and walking like real birds by then.

Why am I calling them Girl and Boy? Scroll down to the next photo.

Photo courtesy of palemale.com
Yes, one eyass is slightly younger than the other by a day or two, so that makes for a size difference but compare their beaks. Girl on the left, has a beak several times bigger than Boy's on the right. Different head shapes too. Females have a "hawkier" look, as Francois Portmann once aptly pointed out, than males, who tend to be rounder skulled somehow. The set of the eyes is different as well.

Photo courtesy of palemale.com
The Stare. Remember Pale Male and Ginger Lima doing exactly this pose on the nest when they were courting? No question that females are the bosses of the nest in Red-tailed Hawk pairs.

There is a more than average difference in size for these two. And they are getting plenty to eat, note those crops so it isn't as if anyone is going hungry. Girl is shaped like her very large strong Mom and Boy shaped small and compact like his dapper Dad.

Photo courtesy of palemale.com

Amazing split second moves here. Eyasses are wired to hit the nest when there is an incoming parent but also look how Ginger has tucked her left wing completely into a fold just in case somebody was slow in going flat.

Just the aerodynamics of nest entrances and exits are almost miraculously meticulous in Red-tails.

Today in particular I am once again reminded how blessed we are that these animals allow us to watch them go through their lives.

We owe them all the protection we can muster for that gift.


Do what you can.

Donegal Browne

Friday, June 10, 2011

Pale Male and Company, Plus rat bait in Central Park and Riverside.


Photo courtesy of palemale.com/
And then there were four, the entire family atop the nest.
Pale Pants from the trip to the nest, and the eyasses hawk eyes focused look at Mom and the meal to be.

Photo courtesy of palemale.com/

The Fifth Avenue Eyasses-Wouldn't you like to sleep that fully relaxed flat on your face in a pile of stick?

A response to Robin of Illinois’s letter to Parks Commissioner Adrien Benepe concerning rat poison in Central Park--

Note my [Robin's, D.B.]underlined and bolded lines in the last paragraph.

I did not write this man. I wrote to Benepe; so Benepe, apparently, has washed his hands of the issue and has passed it along to this person's in-box.

Dear ---:

The NYC Department of Parks & Recreation has forwarded your correspondence regarding the use of pesticides in Central Park .


The single most effective measure that the Central Park Conservancy uses to control rats is aggressive garbage control, including strict sanitation practices which significantly reduce the need for baiting. In addition to keeping all of our landscapes as clean as possible during the day, we have dedicated staff at night whose job it is to empty trash receptacles after 4:00 pm. We utilize rat-proof trash receptacles in heavily trafficked areas, and we are implementing greener practices which will reduce the amount of trash inside the Park.


When a decision is made to put out limited bait, it is premised on the fact there is an actual infestation of rodents. Rats pose a risk to public health and safety. They contaminate food, damage structures and property, and transmit parasites and diseases to other animals and humans. Protecting Central Park's wildlife is of paramount importance, and our rodent control program utilizes best management practices that reflect this.


The Conservancy uses rat bait that poses the least potential for secondary kill. We take appropriate measures to minimize the risk to hawks, other predatory birds, and wildlife through the careful use of secured, limited-access bait boxes that contain no more than 3 ounces of rodenticide. Activated bait boxes are constantly monitored to be sure that they are intact. Staff does not bait in areas where hawks and birds feed during nesting and fledgling season, from approximately late-March to October. Throughout the Park, 70% of what appear to be regular bait boxes are actually population monitoring stations that contain a non-poisonous lure.


The amount of rat bait applied in the Park has significantly and continually declined in the last decade. During the same time period, we have received no reports that any hawks or other raptors have been poisoned in Central Park by the active ingredient used in our limited baiting program. We have been witnessing a diversification of wildlife attributable to our finely-tuned program: chipmunks are returning to the Park as a direct result of the reduction in the competing rat population, and we have received reports that there has been an increase in the numbers of white-footed mice. Establishing, maintaining, and protecting a healthy balance of wildlife in one of the busiest urban parks in the world is immensely challenging, and it will always be one of the goals in all of our endeavors.


For matters concerning Central Park , you may get in touch directly with the Central Park Conservancy. Please do not hesitate to call or email Caroline Greenleaf in our Operations Department, who is the Conservancy's Manager of Community Relations, 212-628-1036, ext. 26, or cgreenleaf@centralparknyc.org.

Sincerely,

Neil Calvanese

VP for Operations

Central Park Conservancy


That said there are at least four hawks who suddenly disappeared from Central Park, having not been elsewhere and who's remains have never been found: Lola, Charlotte, Pale Male Jr. and Pale Beauty. According to palemale.com, parks employees were told not to tell anyone if a dead hawk was found therefore necropsy would not be performed. None of this has been confirmed by me.


In the meantime Bruce Yolton, www.urbanhawks.blogs.com/ has had his meeting with the powers that be over in Riverside Park, he reports--

I was in Riverside Park tonight, not only to visit the hawks but to discuss outstanding hawk safety issues with John Herrold, Riverside Park's Administrator.
John Herrold had news of the necropsy results and it looks as though the second generation poison brodifacoum was the cause of death, and not bromodiolone which was used near the Boat Basin Café. This would point to buildings along Riverside Park which use brodifacoum rather than the park itself. (Changing poisoning habits outside the park will be much more difficult than influencing park policy, I'm afraid.)
Mr. Herrold talked about how concerned and knowledgeable his staff was about the hawks. It was good to hear that Riverside Park had the hawks on their radar.
Mr. Herrold did a great job of listening. We spoke of improving relations between Riverside Park Hawk watchers and the park, possibly having a meeting every March to allow hawk watchers to express concerns for the upcoming season and to meet his staff. Knowing names and faces before a crisis goes a long way.

We also talked about the dumpsters and I learned that the inappropriate dumpster has been removed, dumpsters with lids brought in for the Boat Basin Café, and plans are underway to purchase a solar powered compactor for the marina. So, this issue seems to be close to resolution.

We also talked about poisons in the park. Here he feels, that except for poisons placed near the dumpsters, which believes was done in error, the park has been greatly improving its approach to rat management. He believes that over the last five years serious efforts have been made to reduce rodenticide use, by introducing traps, limit garbage, etc.

I asked if he could evaluate the period poisons prohibited around a nests to possibly have them start when nesting begins and also to evaluate the use of underground application of loose poisons rather than using bait boxes. He said he would look into it.

So, it looks like a positive dialog has begun.
The fledglings looked great. Both are being well feed by their mother and one even played on the ground today. So far, so good.

More to come on these matters.

Donegal Browne